The New Face of Legal Ethics – Billings, Montana – September 9, 2016

I was thrilled to be invited by the Montana Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the Office of the State Public Defender to discuss ethics on September 8, 2016.

montanta-ethics-september-2016-web-001

We discussed Laurence Tribe, a Harvard Law professor, who recently tweeted about a 1996 conversation between Tribe and Donald Trump, wherein Trump had sought legal advice. This tweet drew sharp criticism as many pointed out that the mere disclosure that the conversation had taken place was likely violation of Rule 1.6 governing confidential information.

montanta-ethics-september-2016-web-002

One of Tribe’s critics, Michael Krauss from the George Mason Law School, was quoted in the Wall Street Journal

The ‘issue’ is not at all whether Professor Tribe’s notes are ‘protected by attorney/client privilege.’ No one, to my knowledge, has subpoenaed Tribe’s notes. Rather, ‘the issue’ (to be more precise, one of several issues here) is whether the notes are confidential. Privilege is an evidentiary issue, confidentiality is an ethical issue. Tribe’s problem is now one of ethics, not of evidence. All law students and lawyers should know this.

montanta-ethics-september-2016-web-003

Montana Ethics 2016 WEB VERSION.010

Judges are also receiving attention for their engagement on social media. Increasingly, many judges are becoming more comfortable discussing cases and litigants on Facebook and Twitter. However, it is not at all clear that this trend should be encouraged. New Mexico Judge Samuel Winder was recently admonished by an appellate court for his ill-considered commentary on Facebook.montanta-ethics-september-2016-web-004

While the conviction was reversed on unrelated grounds, the Court went out of is way to comment on the trial judge’s discussion on Facebook.

Judges must avoid not only actual impropriety but also its appearance, and judges must ‘act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the independence, integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

State v. Thomas, 2016 NMSC 024, 6 (N.M. 2016).

2016-billings-cle-brochure

2016-billings-cle-brochure-2

Attorney Erin H. Gerstenzang
Attorney Gerstenzang is a criminal defense lawyer in Atlanta, Georgia who frequently lectures on legal topics relating to DUI and traffic law. Erin has also co-chaired many DUI Seminars working closely with nationally recognized experts in her field of practice. To speak with Erin, call
404-771-6675 or click here to schedule a consultation.